13 November 2005 @ 11:06 am
 
"They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old.
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them".

I don't wear a poppy, I don't give money to the Earl Haig fund (as my dad put it, "I won't help salve a murderer's conscience"), I donate money to the veterans hospices directly. I have never fought in a war, I have never lost a relative through armed conflict. I have no one name to focus on during remembrance day, I have them all.

I do remember my grandpa, the man who drank too much, the man who if his football team (Rangers) lost would come home in a foul mood and hit his wife, the man who spent the latter part of his life never apologising but trying in his own way to make up for what he did. I remember that man falling silent at eleven o'clock every Rememberence Sunday.

I remember that man refusing to eat rice.

He served in the merchant navy in Asia during the latter part of the Second World War. He never talked about what he saw out there, definitely not to his grandkids, but he wouldn't eat rice.

So I observe the silence today, I do it every year. I remember my grandpa, a man broken by what he saw.

But I won't wear a poppy.
 
 
( Post a new comment )
[identity profile] velvetwhip.livejournal.com on November 13th, 2005 08:18 am (UTC)
:::hugs you:::


Gabrielle
(Reply) (Link)
[identity profile] smhwpf.livejournal.com on November 13th, 2005 11:26 am (UTC)
Ay. War sucks.

I always feel ambivalent about wearing a poppy. (And therefore usually end up not by default.)

On the one hand, to me the poppy is, or should be, about commemorating the horrors of war, the senseless loss - which, given where the poppy originates, figures. But on the other hand it is also associated with the idea of 'glorious sacrifice', which I don't really want to be part of.

Then there is the white 'peace' poppy, which is better ideologically from my point of view, but I worry that it might be seen as a slap in the face for those who fought, although that is not the intention. I don't know if that's a reasonable concern.

Of course there's always the alternative of wearing both, but that would require being organised.

The Ear Haig fund... is that what the poppy money goes to? I didn't realise that was what it's called. If so, then that is a good enough reason for not wearing one, as you say...
[identity profile] whiskyinmind.livejournal.com on November 13th, 2005 11:47 am (UTC)
At least in Scotland it's the Earl Haig fund who organise the sale of red poppies and donations, I'm fairly sure that's a nationwide thing. I also agree - the white poppy would seem to be a better solution but there is always that lingering feeling that it might be seen as an insult even though it's anything but.

One of the first poems I studied from a critical perspective in English class was a Wilfred Owen poem, and it generates the same dichotomy of feelings - acknowledging the pointlessness of war whilst wishing to honour those who fought and died. Dulce Et Decorum Est (http://www.illyria.com/owenpro.html)

My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori."